![]() If you have facts to back this up, please present them. The fact that there is "a bigger community of developers" developing and bugfixing the LibreOffice code, would tend to contradict Brunner's statement. There is also development underway for an Android version of LibreOffice.Ī lot of dead code has been removed from LibreOffice. If you are using a Release Candidate, (RC), or some other Development version, then yes, LibreOffice might be less stable than an OpenOffice "Stable" version, however, the "Stable" versions of either the 4.3.x.x version ("Fresh"), or the 4.2.x.x ("Still") branches are just as "Stable" as OpenOffice "Stable", if not more so. Why do you or Daniel Brunner think OpenOffice is more stable? "However, the former suite is more stable and is available on mobile computing platforms, he says, while the latter benefits from a bigger community of developers, introducing more new features." In your article you quote Brunner as saying: Presenation by Daniel Brunner (video, German) Presentation by Daniel Brunner (PDF, German) ![]() Should OpenOffice and LibreOffice unite? Will a unified OpenLibreOffice bring more public administrations to replacing the proprietary alternatives? What do you think? "This offsets small problems they encounter elsewhere." "If they don't see the benefits, don't even start." For end users, the switch must bring new possibilities, adding value. Public administrations that consider open source, need to make sure its management understands the advantages of this type of software, Brunner said. Another tool lets users create PDF documents from documents received by email. The court makes extensive use of document templates, which are developed in the XML specification for the Open Document Format, enabling automated document generation services. One example is a service that removes identifying particulars or details from the legal documents. The court also develops its own software, which it makes available as open source. Desktop tools include the Mozilla Thunderbird email client and Mozilla Firefox web browser. The IT department uses Thinlinc, based on Tigervnc for sharing applications across desktops. The Supreme Court's IT system is built on top of Red Hat Linux server, running Zimbra for email, instant messaging and calendar. "We want to be able to switch from one Linux distribution to another." The court also demands that open source solutions must be common: "We do not want to be locked in to a specialised open source application." Software solutions must be independent from IT vendors. Three months ago, the court's IT department included a few requirements specific to open source in its strategy, Brunner said. The court moved to using open source following an IT strategy that originally only specified the use of open IT standards, Brunner told the conference attendees. The court has about 460 desktop PCs, all running OpenOffice. ![]() The court is one of the country's prime examples of a public administration using free and open source solutions. ![]() However, the former suite is more stable and is available on mobile computing platforms, he says, while the latter benefits from a bigger community of developers, introducing more new features. The Swiss Federal Supreme Court uses OpenOffice, but according to Brunner would benefit from the improved document filters that are available in LibreOffice. ![]() "I had to test this presentation in both suites, to see if it would work." The current division between the two groups risks creating more instead of less incompatibilities, Brunner warned last week, speaking at the LibreOffice conference, which took place in the Swiss city of Bern. Merging the two projects will convince more public administrations to use the open source office suite, he believes. The software developers working on Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice - two closely related suites of open source office productivity tools - should overcome their schism and unite to compete with the ubiquitous proprietary alternative, urges Daniel Brunner, head of the IT department of Switzerland's Federal Supreme Court. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |